We present a new evaluation scheme for the lexical substitution task. Following (McCarthy and Navigli, 2007) we conducted an annotation task for French that mixes two datasets: in the first one, 300 sentences containing a target word (among 30 different) were submitted to annotators who were asked to provide substitutes. The second one contains the propositions of the systems that participated to the lexical substitution task based on the same data. The idea is first, to assess the capacity of the systems to provide good substitutes that would not have been proposed by the annotators and second, to measure the impact on the task evaluation of a new gold standard that incorporates these additional data. While (McCarthy and Navigli, 2009) have conducted a similar post hoc analysis, re-evaluation of the systems' performances has not been carried out to our knowledge. This experiment shows interesting differences between the two resulting datasets and gives insight on how automatically retrieved substitutes can provide complementary data to a lexical production task, without however a major impact on the evaluation of the systems.
@InProceedings{TANGUY18.86, author = {Ludovic Tanguy and Cécile Fabre and Laura Rivière}, title = "{Extending the gold standard for a lexical substitution task: is it worth it?}", booktitle = {Proceedings of the Eleventh International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC 2018)}, year = {2018}, month = {May 7-12, 2018}, address = {Miyazaki, Japan}, editor = {Nicoletta Calzolari (Conference chair) and Khalid Choukri and Christopher Cieri and Thierry Declerck and Sara Goggi and Koiti Hasida and Hitoshi Isahara and Bente Maegaard and Joseph Mariani and Hélène Mazo and Asuncion Moreno and Jan Odijk and Stelios Piperidis and Takenobu Tokunaga}, publisher = {European Language Resources Association (ELRA)}, isbn = {979-10-95546-00-9}, language = {english} }
Summary of the paper