Summary of the paper

Title Evaluating Complement-Modifier Distinctions in a Semantically Annotated Corpus
Authors Mark McConville and Myroslava O. Dzikovska
Abstract We evaluate the extent to which the distinction between semantically core and non-core dependents as used in the FrameNet corpus corresponds to the traditional distinction between syntactic complements and modifiers of a verb, for the purposes of harvesting a wide-coverage verb lexicon from FrameNet for use in deep linguistic processing applications. We use the VerbNet verb database as our gold standard for making judgements about complement-hood, in conjunction with our own intuitions in cases where VerbNet is incomplete. We conclude that there is enough agreement between the two notions (0.85) to make practical the simple expedient of equating core PP dependents in FrameNet with PP complements in our lexicon. Doing so means that we lose around 13% of PP complements, whilst around 9% of the PP dependents left in the lexicon are not complements.
Language Single language
Topics Lexicon, lexical database, Corpus (creation, annotation, etc.), Syntax
Full paper Evaluating Complement-Modifier Distinctions in a Semantically Annotated Corpus
Slides Evaluating Complement-Modifier Distinctions in a Semantically Annotated Corpus
Bibtex @InProceedings{MCCONVILLE08.691,
  author = {Mark McConville and Myroslava O. Dzikovska},
  title = {Evaluating Complement-Modifier Distinctions in a Semantically Annotated Corpus},
  booktitle = {Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC'08)},
  year = {2008},
  month = {may},
  date = {28-30},
  address = {Marrakech, Morocco},
  editor = {Nicoletta Calzolari (Conference Chair), Khalid Choukri, Bente Maegaard, Joseph Mariani, Jan Odijk, Stelios Piperidis, Daniel Tapias},
  publisher = {European Language Resources Association (ELRA)},
  isbn = {2-9517408-4-0},
  note = {http://www.lrec-conf.org/proceedings/lrec2008/},
  language = {english}
  }

Powered by ELDA © 2008 ELDA/ELRA