Summary of the paper
| Title | Hope and Fear: How Opinions Influence Factuality |
|---|---|
| Authors | Chantal Van Son, Marieke Van Erp, Antske Fokkens and Piek Vossen |
| Abstract | Both sentiment and event factuality are fundamental information levels for our understanding of events mentioned in news texts. Most research so far has focused on either modeling opinions or factuality. In this paper, we propose a model that combines the two for the extraction and interpretation of perspectives on events. By doing so, we can explain the way people perceive changes in (their belief of) the world as a function of their fears of changes to the bad or their hopes of changes to the good. This study seeks to examine the effectiveness of this approach by applying factuality annotations, based on FactBank, on top of the MPQA Corpus, a corpus containing news texts annotated for sentiments and other private states. Our findings suggest that this approach can be valuable for the understanding of perspectives, but that there is still some work to do on the refinement of the integration. |
| Topics | Opinion Mining / Sentiment Analysis, Other |
Full paper  |
Hope and Fear: How Opinions Influence Factuality |
| Bibtex | @InProceedings{VANSON14.188, author = {Chantal Van Son and Marieke Van Erp and Antske Fokkens and Piek Vossen}, title = {Hope and Fear: How Opinions Influence Factuality}, booktitle = {Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC'14)}, year = {2014}, month = {may}, date = {26-31}, address = {Reykjavik, Iceland}, editor = {Nicoletta Calzolari (Conference Chair) and Khalid Choukri and Thierry Declerck and Hrafn Loftsson and Bente Maegaard and Joseph Mariani and Asuncion Moreno and Jan Odijk and Stelios Piperidis}, publisher = {European Language Resources Association (ELRA)}, isbn = {978-2-9517408-8-4}, language = {english} } |