LREC 2000 - Papers

LREC 2000 2^nd International Conference on Language Resources & Evaluation

Conference Papers

Papers by paper title: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z

Papers by ID number: 1-50, 51-100, 101-150, 151-200, 201-250, 251-300, 301-350, 351-377.

List of all papers and abstracts.

Previous (Panel) Next Paper

Title The Cost258 Signal Generation Test Array

Authors Bailly Gerard (ICP - UMR CNRS no5009, INPG & U3, 46 av. Felix Viallet, 38031 Grenoble CEDEX, France)
Banga Eduardo R. (ETSI Telecomunicacion, Campus Universitario, Universidad de Vigo, 36200 Vigo, Spain)
Monaghan Alex (National Centre for Language Technology, Dublin City University, Dublin 9, Ireland)
Rank Erhard (INTHF, Vienna University of Technology, Gusshausstrasse 25/E389, A-1040 Vienna, Austria)

Keywords Analysis-Modification-Synthesis systems, Objective evaluation, Server, Speech

Session Session SO4 - Speech Synthesis Evaluation

Abstract This paper describes a benchmark for Analysis-Modification-Synthesis Systems (AMSS) that are back-ends of all concatenative speech synthesis systems. After introducing the motivations and principles underlying this initiative, we present here a first anonymous objective evaluation comparing the performance of 5 such AMSS.

Verdana">

Title	The Cost258 Signal Generation Test Array
Authors	Bailly Gerard (ICP - UMR CNRS no5009, INPG & U3, 46 av. Felix Viallet, 38031 Grenoble CEDEX, France) Banga Eduardo R. (ETSI Telecomunicacion, Campus Universitario, Universidad de Vigo, 36200 Vigo, Spain) Monaghan Alex (National Centre for Language Technology, Dublin City University, Dublin 9, Ireland) Rank Erhard (INTHF, Vienna University of Technology, Gusshausstrasse 25/E389, A-1040 Vienna, Austria)
Keywords	Analysis-Modification-Synthesis systems, Objective evaluation, Server, Speech
Session	Session SO4 - Speech Synthesis Evaluation
Abstract	This paper describes a benchmark for Analysis-Modification-Synthesis Systems (AMSS) that are back-ends of all concatenative speech synthesis systems. After introducing the motivations and principles underlying this initiative, we present here a first anonymous objective evaluation comparing the performance of 5 such AMSS.